Adding a calming rule to value is only worthwhile if it does not quietly gut the return. So we measured the trade precisely: how much you gave up for the smoother ride, whether you could still concentrate, and what this steadier value screen really is underneath.
The worry with any defensive tweak is that it trades away the very edge it is meant to protect. Here it did not. The calm filter kept the value premium almost fully intact, and even left the strategy safe to concentrate, which raw deep value never was.
Run it four ways and the return holds up beautifully across them: the broad decile, the thirty, and even the tightest ten all compounded around 18 to 21% a year, with the concentrated cut, if anything, the strongest. Recall that in raw deep value, concentrating lowered the return, because any single cheap stock might be a trap. The calm filter screens those traps out, so here you could lean into your best names safely. You gave up only a couple of points of raw return, and bought both a gentler ride and the freedom to concentrate.
Underneath, it is still a value tilt, but a tamer one: it tracked a broad market index closely and added a more modest excess of roughly 2 to 4% a year, smaller than raw value's but earned with a fraction of the volatility. The calm rule pulls the portfolio toward larger, steadier cheap companies, so you sacrifice some of deep value's ferocious premium in exchange for a strategy that behaves. It is a deliberate, sensible trade, not a free lunch.
Two last checks make the risk concrete: what the basket was actually made of, by company size, and, instead of the single drawdown path, the worst fall you would have suffered no matter which month you started and held for five years.
Put it together and defensive value is what most people should probably own if they want the value premium at all. It keeps nearly the whole edge, lets you concentrate, halves the drawdown, and fills the portfolio with companies you can actually name and hold. The only thing it costs is a slice of the spectacular upside that almost nobody survives to collect anyway. Whether you would rather have the bigger number you abandon or the slightly smaller one you keep is the only real question, and it is about you, not the screen.
Weight cheapness against calm differently, tighten or loosen the volatility filter, change how many names you hold, and watch the return and the ride move together. The right balance is the one you could live with through a bad year, and only you know where that is.
So we took it to Krest, and ran it through the whole test.
Free · no account needed
Don't take our word for any of it. Every figure in this teardown came from a few clicks on Krest, and each is a click from the full, live analysis. Reading and exploring is free.
For education only. Not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security, strategy, or product. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and all investing carries risk, including the possible loss of capital. Make your own decisions, and consider consulting a SEBI registered investment adviser.
Best effort analysis. Prepared on a best effort basis from historical data and may contain errors, omissions, or assumptions. Shared for information and discussion only, and should be independently verified before you rely on it. Krest accepts no liability for any decision made or loss incurred based on it.
Figures reflect a defensive value screen (ranked by earnings yield and one year volatility, positive EBIT, market cap above ₹1,000 cr), reconstructed yearly over the last ten years of Indian data (since June 2016), measured against the Nifty 500 total return index. Concentration and closest index figures computed across all rolling windows.
Krest · mykrest.com